Within literature of exile, the poetics of ‘returning home’ gathers multiple cultural heritage as well as the ‘belonging to’ symbolism focusing on the space/character ‘in distress’ to project a special world reconstruction coordinated by the ‘marquee de parole’ (Dominique Chancé, L’auteur en souffrance, PUF, 2000). In fact, it displays a different imaginary perspective centred around our own view on Otherness embedded in a ‘discourse of the margin’, a pent discourse. From this perspective, the writes enters the space controlled by the cultural studies in the form of a specific collective identity. Actually, the winners of the Nobel prize of the last decades (Naipaul, for instance) belong to this new vision rooted in the exile’s intercultural space. This innovative writing convention - implying various ‘silences métadiscursifs’ - points out a critical discourse related to that ‘narration seconde’ within which philosophical thinking and poetical/historical discourse are reloading the writer’s biographical - intellectual quest. Our study analyses this fictional discourse which rejects the legitimating systems based on ‘true/false’ values to re-construct the space viewed as ‘reality effect’ enhanced by a possible world - the last borderline separating ‘history’ and man.