<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="client.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<article article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id/>
<issn/>
<banner>
<href>banner.jpg</href>
<size width="100%"/>
</banner>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<copyright></copyright>
<title-group>
<article-title>Coherence and Supplementary Materials</article-title>
</title-group>

<author> Tsisana Giguashvili and Irakli Gurgenidze</author>

<aff>Tbilisi State University, Georgia </aff>



</article-meta></front>
<body>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>Various types of supplementary materials including skill development and practice materials, collections of communicative activities and authentic sources, as additions to course books,  have always been significant  in the process of teaching the English language.</p>
<p>The paper deals with the objectives of  applying the  additional educational sources to distinguish coherence &#8211; the connection of the  students&#8217; background knowledge with the appropriate material of a course book &#8211;for developing learners&#8217; receptive,  in this case,  reading skills.</p>
<p>The paper also reveals the results of the experiment conducted with ESP students: In the selection of the supplementary materials the priority is given to the students&#8217; choice thus enhancing their independence and encouraging their motivation.</p>


<p><italic>Keywords: </italic> Supplementary materials, Coherence, Receptive, Productive skills.
</p>
</abstract>
<fpdf>
<href>pdflogo.jpg</href>
<hpdf>P4RS391</hpdf>
</fpdf>
</body>
</article>
