<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="client.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<article article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id/>
<issn/>
<banner>
<href>banner.jpg</href>
<size width="100%"/>
</banner>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<title-group>
<article-title>Comparison of Nondetects-Data Regression and Multiple Imputation for Nondetects Data </article-title>
</title-group>

<author>Guven Ozkaya</author>

<aff>Uludag University, Turkey</aff>

</article-meta></front>
<body>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>In some situations, data can not be measured due to the devices used in the health sciences. They fall
below one or more detection limits. Nondetects analysis can be used in this situation. Several methods
are used as Nondetects analysis. Nondetects-Data Regression and Multiple Imputation methods were
compared in this study. Both methods were compared according to root mean square error. Various
non detects data proportions, sample size and R-suared. Some general suggestions are given on which
tests should be used.</p>
<p><italic>Keywords: </italic>Nondetects data, Multiple ımputation, Nondetects-data regression.</p>
</abstract>
<fpdf>
<href>pdflogo.jpg</href>
<hpdf>E7X144</hpdf>
</fpdf>
</body>
</article>
